-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
NO-ISSUE: Synchronize From Upstream Repositories #695
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NO-ISSUE: Synchronize From Upstream Repositories #695
Conversation
@openshift-bot: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@openshift-bot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: openshift/openshift-team-operator-ecosystem. Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval. This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-bot The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
1 similar comment
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval. This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-bot The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Found the error log. Not sure exactly what the issue is yet...(here's the artifacts link too)
|
ecdf26f
to
519a12e
Compare
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
519a12e
to
bf877f6
Compare
@openshift-bot: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
/retest |
bf877f6
to
066043d
Compare
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
/retest |
066043d
to
b447b09
Compare
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
…er collection (#3175) Signed-off-by: Joe Lanford <[email protected]> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: 6243cd1727b82ab5d4c73febce4aedcd848ef441
…ervices (#3169) * Apply Subscription.Spec.Config.Annotations to deployments Signed-off-by: Jacob Floyd <[email protected]> * Apply Subscription.Spec.Config.Annotations to Deployment Pods Signed-off-by: Jacob Floyd <[email protected]> * Apply Subscription.Spec.Config.Annotations to ApiServices Signed-off-by: Jacob Floyd <[email protected]> * Refactor and Test InjectAnnotationsIntoDeployment Signed-off-by: Jacob Floyd <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: Jacob Floyd <[email protected]> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: 40ba65cac74720a51260ebb647f7a13f923bc0fd
Signed-off-by: Mikalai Radchuk <[email protected]> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: 9f42a6f3951b3b9d9064233490d24ecfc201a40e
Signed-off-by: Jordan Keister <[email protected]> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: cdf8949948767305da52fd63bf443b4bb882bcf9
Signed-off-by: Jordan Keister <[email protected]> Upstream-repository: operator-registry Upstream-commit: d924b765b93a279dc7af72c3908d88e936262593
Bumps [github.com/opencontainers/image-spec](https://github.com/opencontainers/image-spec) from 1.1.0-rc5 to 1.1.0-rc6. - [Release notes](https://github.com/opencontainers/image-spec/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/opencontainers/image-spec/blob/main/RELEASES.md) - [Commits](opencontainers/image-spec@v1.1.0-rc5...v1.1.0-rc6) Upstream-repository: operator-registry Upstream-commit: 27612df8e019df5885d3047db2186bf3e36fecbf --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: github.com/opencontainers/image-spec dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-patch ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Jordan Keister <[email protected]> Upstream-repository: operator-registry Upstream-commit: efddcb3e6fd7e972235223b63c599691a0321e10
b447b09
to
ac771e7
Compare
@openshift-bot: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] This PR has been included in build operator-lifecycle-manager-container-v4.16.0-202402230438.p0.gaec0f1d.assembly.stream.el9 for distgit operator-lifecycle-manager. |
The staging/ and vendor/ directories have been synchronized from the upstream repositories, pulling in the following commits:
This pull request is expected to merge without any human intervention. If tests are failing here, changes must land upstream to fix any issues so that future downstreaming efforts succeed.
/cc @openshift/openshift-team-operator-runtime
/cc @openshift/openshift-team-operator-ecosystem